Christine Flowers: Malala was in Philly this week. Her message should echo to the White House
There are a few people in the world who are instantly recognizable by their first names: Madonna, the mother of Jesus Christ, who himself had two names, as well as the singer; Beyonce; Rihanna; Bruce; Cher; Elvis; Prince; Sting; Einstein; Socrates; Plato; Bono; and I’m sure I’m missing a host of other One Name Wonders.
This column is about one particular person who is known around the world by her first name, and who has been a part of the cultural and political landscape for well over a decade: Malala.
I have known about this brave young woman from the moment that she was catapulted, against her will, into the limelight. In 2011, while traveling on a school bus in the KPK region of Northwestern Pakistan, Malala was shot through the head by the Taliban.
Her crime? Advocating for girls’ education.
I followed her trajectory, from an emergency flight to England and lifesaving brain surgery, to her continued advocacy on behalf of young girls and women, to her emergence as an important figure on the world stage, and finally, when she won the Nobel Peace Prize at the age of fifteen, the youngest person to have received the award.
And then, I kind of forgot about her. That’s not actually true.
Malala has always been on my radar screen because of the work that I do, which involves representing immigrants, refugees and asylum applicants.
Since I have a fairly large number of Pakistani clients who come from the same region of the world as Malala, their own stories reminded me of what she had to go through to survive, and then ultimately triumph.
The interesting thing about my clients, though, is that each of them was a man.
There were teachers who had defied the Taliban by insisting on admitting girls into their schools.
There were businessmen who insisted on teaching young women skills that would allow them to earn a living, and not simply be slaves to the home.
There were vaccine advocates, who worked alongside of women to ensure that children received the necessary protections against polio and other communicable diseases.
There were social workers, and political activists, and men of the same ethnicity as Malala who fought for the dignity of their people in a country that often discriminates against the Pashtun.
For that reason, Tuesday night was personal for me. It was the Philadelphia stop on Malala’s book tour, connected to the publication of her second memoir entitled “Finding My Way.”
It was at the Fillmore, a venue I’d never visited but was perfect for the event because it was large enough to hold the huge crowed that had shown up, funky enough to satisfy the young girls and teens who wanted to see a hero who looked and sounded like them, and comfortable enough to not strain the aging backs of older ladies like me and the schoolteachers who came to marvel at a warrior for education.
I’m used to being in the presence of heroic people. They come into my office on a daily basis, with their folders and their papers and their hopes.
Many of the men that I mentioned earlier are matched by women who have fled untold horrors, carrying their children on their backs to escape abusive partners and the threats of gang members.
I do not know if I would have their strength. You don’t, either.
And seeing Malala on the stage, a woman who had found that strength as a girl, was a revelation. She was not the iconic figure stepping off of her pedestal to engage with the “little people.”
She was, like my clients, a human being with a story to tell. It’s just that she had already told it to millions while my clients are fortunate if they get the opportunity to tell it to one lawyer, one officer, one judge, one person who has the power to change their lives by allowing them to live it.
Today, under the Trump administration with its severe restrictions on asylum, that is becoming less and less possible.
Which is why Malala’s words touched me so deeply. At one point in the program, she was asked about the Taliban takeover in neighboring Afghanistan.
She paused, and then explained that when the country fell to the Taliban, she was undergoing the final surgery to address the injuries she’d suffered when shot in the head.
She mentioned that she knew how hard it was for her to survive one attack and then be able to escape. She said that she could not imagine how hard it must be for the women and girls who were sentenced to living, without the possibility of relief, under the Taliban.
This is the comment that stayed with me: “One of the girls (in Afghanistan) told me that she stays hopeful in this difficult time because even though she is alone at home and knows that she cannot go to a school, but when she can pick up a book and read, she feels that that is an act of resistance.”
When I heard those words, and I looked around the room at young girls who will never have to worry that reading a book can get you killed, I realized that this is a message for everyone who thinks that asylum seekers should be stopped at the border, and silenced.
I hope Malala’s message reaches the White House.
This column originally appeared in the Delco Times.
Christine Flowers can be reached at cflowers1961@gmail.com.

I have 2 question: 1) Who pays your fees, your client, their family, or US taxpayers? 2) Why don’t the people and government of Pakistan stop the Taliban from terrorizing their women and teachers?
Madonna… the American singer, songwriter, and actress (born 1958)?
Bruce… Lee? Springsteen? Willis? Hornsby?
You could’ve mentioned actual famous people with unique first names that contributed to society… Aristotle, Pericles, Hippocrates, Confucius, (the) Buddha, Cleopatra, Galileo…
But since all the women you basically mentioned are licentious entertainers with famous first names you missed some easy ones: Oprah, Adele, Shakira, P!nk, Ashanti, and Selena.
You actually glanced upon a serious topic no one is willing to talk about in the mainstream. Our modern culture celebrates, glorifies, and encourages women to value feelings rather than virtues and objective facts. So, perhaps you may be incapable of an honest assessment on below:
In the US our poorest populations (mostly white) have significant consanguineous unions (sexual activity between close relatives) amongst individuals of common ancestry. Most of the time it is unwitting, and with unknown half-relations (unknown half-sibling or half-cousin.) Our nation dishonestly has used abortion to mitigate that sad reality. Because that type of consanguineous situation is taboo in our society.
Tommy Robinson has made outrageous claims that British Pakistanis—who make up around 3% of the UK population—account for 33% of birth defects in that country. No doubt factors such as poverty, lack of healthcare access, etcetera play a role. However, cousin marriage is a long-standing INTENTIONAL tradition in many parts of South Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa and serious people think perhaps that is the primary cause of those defects. Those particular UK Pakistanis refuse to assimilate to Western and UK norms. So why would we want more of that in the United States? And if you can’t have a serious (respectful) conversation that acknowledges that particular issue, how can you begin to change that behavior? We don’t need more mass invasion, like we see presenting itself in the current Minneapolis mayoral election, because our US cities already need serious help. Bringing in mass amounts of foreign people unwilling to assimilate won’t help anyone. Look into that ridiculous situation in Minneapolis, US… good grief.
FYI it is legal to marry your cousin in New Jersey and was de riguer among royalty in Europe.
That explains a lot.
Nicely argued. Malala’s message isn’t team-branded; it’s a call to protect kids and keep classrooms alive, even when politics run hot. We can condemn extremism, demand lawful conduct, and still push for humanitarian relief. If leaders in D.C. hear anything, let it be that moral clarity pairs best with practical steps that lower the human cost.
It is not the United States job to police the world. I doubt you missed it, but just a reminder: President Biden mocked the idea people with sidearms could defeat jets, tanks, and battleships. Yet, Afghanistan defeated both the Soviet Union (1979 – 1989 a 10 yr war), and the UK and the United States (2001 – 2021 roughly 20 yrs and UK left in 2014.) So… what are you talking about? The United States has 38 trillion in debt, our cities are worse than most war zones around the world with sections of them that are literally no-go zones and unwalkable for tax paying citizens. You can use YOUR money to pay for whatever you want. More of MY money is about to be taken away in DelCo because we have too many people already relying on handouts from the government. Our public schools are in failure. So, we don’t need more waves of immigrants unwilling to assimilate. We tried nation building and it does not work. Go volunteer in Pakistan if you want. Thankfully we are finally having people call out the non-religious Zionists that run the media and Big Corp boardrooms. Btw, those non-religious Zionists are the ones that happily promote the licentious famous one named women, and encourage gangsta garbage mores. And they are the ones pushing for all of this mass migration of non-Christians to the West. Finally people are talking about it. It will end soon.
Afghanistan bled the USSR dry with our help by supplying the Mujadeen freedom fighters with arms, specifically stingers. The terrain and the winters did the rest, but I get your point.