Photo by catholicnews.org.uk Photo by catholicnews.org.uk

Christine Flowers: What comes next for the Church?

I am a papal expert, because I have seen the following three movies over the past two days:

Conclave

Shoes of the Fisherman

The Cardinal

I was aiming for a doctorate in theological studies, but couldn’t download The Da Vinci Code to my server, so I’ll have to be satisfied with an undergraduate level degree.

I also wanted to have a bit more expertise on Jesuits in order to be able to address the differences between the last Pope, who was a member of that order, and any upcoming candidates, but I couldn’t deal with watching The Mission for a hundredth time.

Still, I’m your gal on Popestory.

Try the fish sticks, I’m here all week.

The point is that none of us knows what will happen when the conclave convenes next month, and anyone who wields a microphone telling you what will likely happen is simply giving their own opinions on what they hope will happen. This column presumes to do nothing less, and nothing more.

I have some favorites, because I would love to see the church return to its more traditional, less “touchy-feely” roots. I know that many Catholics were brought back to the fold by the manner and methods of Pope Francis, and I acknowledge that he was a good man who clearly read the secular room extremely well, but he also managed to alienate many of us who have filled the pews for decades.

It’s like that story of the Prodigal Son, or the Lost Lamb. Jesus goes out to bring the lost one home, even though the faithful were waiting patiently back on the ranch. It never seemed fair to me that He would risk everything to bring back the troublemaker at the expense of ignoring those who tried to follow the rules. Of course, the people who loved Francis will tell you that this is exactly the message of Christ, to reach out to the marginalized and the searching.

Whatever.

My point is that perhaps it’s time to start paying attention to those who may have wandered away from the pews because they felt that the church no longer spoke to them, the people who didn’t like the moral ambiguity that posed as empathy, and who believe, as someone once said, that clarity is charity.

I’m one of them, even though I haven’t strayed very far (except Bless me Father for I have sinned and yes I missed the last four Sundays at Mass but this was only because I had a lot of work to do saving immigrants from deportation so maybe I get a dispensation, right?)

I want a clear message that abortion is evil, a sin, murder, and that’s that.

I want a clear message that we have compassion for everyone regardless of sexual orientation but, no, we don’t bless same-sex unions.

I want a clear message that yes women are an indispensable strength for the church and it was built on our shoulders as well, but, no, we do not get to be priests simply because the feminists say it’s a thing.

I want a clear message that opening our doors to refugees and immigrants is a fundamental part of our mission and our faith obligation, and that calling people “illegals” is as inhuman as calling them “a clump of cells.”

And I want a clear message that we don’t play favorites with world leaders we like, and make snarky messages about those we don’t.

That’s not too much to ask, is it?

As far as my preferences, there are three people that would make me do cartwheels in the street if elevated to the papacy.

The most obvious one is Cardinal Robert Sarah from Guinea, who has been dubbed the “anti-woke prelate” by Fox News.

I doubt he relishes that title, but there is a great deal of truth in the idea that this is a man who represents the more socially conservative branch of the church. He co-authored a book with former Pope Benedict that reiterated the necessity for priestly celibacy. He has stated, quite clearly, that the west has “cut itself off from its Christian roots,” which has angered many who think that he is arguing for a Christian State, when all he is doing is acknowledging the central role that the church has played throughout history. He has also called gender ideology “a Luciferian refusal to receive a sexual nature from God.” And of course, he is strongly anti-abortion.

He is, in short, the perfect Pope. And he comes from a part of the world where Christianity is expanding, not receding as it has in the west, which is one of the reasons that he insists on highlighting our Christian roots.

Alas, he is almost 80, and this might make some of the other cardinals wary of electing someone who might have a short and turbulent papacy.

Then there is Pierbattista Pizzaballa, whose name alone makes him a fabulous candidate. Can you imagine a Pope Pizzaballa? It’s Father Guido Sarducci, on steroids. But on a more serious note, Cardinal Pizzaballa, prelate of Jerusalem, has spent the majority of his life in the Middle East, the region in the world where Christians have traditionally been most persecuted would be a brilliant choice. We need a warrior like Karol Wotyla who labored behind the Iron Curtain for the faith in the face of persecution. He is 60, can be there for decades, and (allow me a little high five) is Italian. And while he is a softer conservative than Cardinal Sarah, he holds the line on LGBT issues and abortion. He angered some with his push for an end to the war in Gaza, but, um, do we really want a Pope who celebrates war? Plus, he’s been a strong critic of Hamas.

Another fantastic choice would be Fridolin Ambongo Besugu, from the Congo, who is very conservative in his politics of the church and on moral teaching and who is from an area in the world where, unlike among those of us in the pampered West, the church is growing despite increased persecution of her children. He is also young and black, which despite the whole “I hate DEI” blather, matters to a growing flock in the Third World. He is a younger version of Sarah.

All three men are like John Paul II in their devotion to defending the faith and who do not mistake ambiguity in moral issues with empathy. We won’t get “who am I to judge” from them. We will not have them ignoring those of us who stayed to gather up those of us who strayed. We will have a Pope for all of us, and one who is able to articulate the core precepts of our faith instead of gently buffering the edges for those who don’t want to hear it.

Now, let me go get my popcorn and settle down to watch The Nun’s Story to deepen my expertise in the female perspective on all of this.

email icon

Subscribe to our mailing list:

8 thoughts on “Christine Flowers: What comes next for the Church?”

  1. Let’s face it, you don’t want a Pope who will be critical of Donald Trump. Trump is so cold and cruel to “illegals” which Jesus called neighbors I can’t imagine the Cardinals would pick anyone who is onboard with that.

    1. Pam, two quick things: 1) Yes, love your neighbor! But your neighbor has defined boundaries which make them… your neighbor; instead of your household member. If your neighbor is breaking and entering or burglarizing your house – you can still love them but you have every right to defend your home and seek to exercise Justice. If you don’t understand that… there is really no help for you.
      2) It is absolutely stunning that many suffering from TDS don’t realize most of the voters who did select Trump, are still very critical of Donald Trump (the man) AND some of the policies within the First AND Second Administration. But we saw the Biden Administration and the Deep State align with legacy media to scheme, steal, and lie and lie and lie for four years. From the debacle in Afghanistan, to experimental gene therapy “vaccine” mandates, to trans-nonsense, to Green-mania, etc. Thank the God that Trump won! His first 100 days were awesome! But here is an example of a grievous error of the second Trump Administration: recently they’ve conflated criticism of Israel with support for terrorism, potentially censoring protected political speech. By requiring universities to monitor students, it exerts indirect government pressure on academic freedom, a form of censorship through intimidation. If ideas are censored rather than debated it is an obvious tell that a position can’t withstand scrutiny and should be refined. The scale of funding cuts and demands for policy changes (e.g., auditing viewpoints) suggest an intent to control academic discourse, particularly on Israel-Palestine issues. By tying funding to compliance, the administration indirectly censors universities, as financial pressure may lead to self-censorship of pro-Palestinian activism. Columbia’s compliance with some of these demands, unlike Harvard’s defiance, illustrates this chilling effect.

  2. When you asked: “ Can you imagine a Pope Pizzaballa?” I couldn’t help thinking what if his name was Matzaballa?

  3. One of the most trenchant things I have noticed about the “illegals” argument is the attempt to merge the idea of controlled borders , with the idea that anyone should be able to enter the country without regards to the law and the vetting process. Open access for the barbarians of MS-113 or Tren De Argua is not a social benefit or neighbourly action. Organizations that admire hacking a person to death with machetes for street “cred” are not, in my mind, good material to construct a functioning, peaceful society. Continuing, I don’t know what calling President Trump “cold and cruel” means when trying to at least get rid of the bad guys who came into the country. If you take a look at other countries in the world, being an illegal immigrant carries harsh. Check out one close by, Mexico, if you want to see harsh. I am not Catholic, but I hope that the new pope doesn’t try to conflate Christian teaching with immigration policy that incorporates the politics of unlimited, unfettered access (which often uses Christian teaching to justify political positions).

  4. “I have some favorites, because I would love to see the church return to its more traditional, less “touchy-feely” roots.” – You mean instead if helping the poor, feeding the hungry, and help the sick. IS Christ’s message touchy-feely?

    “but he also managed to alienate many of us who have filled the pews for decades.” – We need to really need to go back to days of sin and punishment.

    “Of course, the people who loved Francis will tell you that this is exactly the message of Christ, to reach out to the marginalized and the searching.” – If this is not Christ’s message, what is it?

    “He has stated, quite clearly, that the west has “cut itself off from its Christian roots,”” – How many wars and lives were lost in Europe were fought over whose version of Christianity was the right one. Today we live in a world of many faiths and a lot of them have just as many followers as the Church. Forcing people to do this led to the Crusades, the Inquisition, the Conquistadors, Children being sold by Catholic Hospitals, the hundreds of years of protecting pedophile priests instead of their parishioners, progroms throughout Europe as late as 1947, and helping Nazi’s escape justice after WWII.

    “All three men are like John Paul II in their devotion to defending the faith and who do not mistake ambiguity in moral issues with empathy. We won’t get “who am I to judge” from them.” – Unless you have walked a mile in someone else’s shoes you are on no position to Judge.

    “And I want a clear message that we don’t play favorites with world leaders we like, and make snarky messages about those we don’t.” – So the Pope should not call out leaders who engage in hate. Whenever you write something or post a reply its is loaded with snark. Including this column.

    “I want a clear message that abortion is evil, a sin, murder, and that’s that.” – Passing laws that do not favor one religion over another is what you really want. The Church already condemns abortion.

  5. Actually, the guy you admire so much, Trump, thinks he’s the next Pope. Trump mocks all Catholics, and conservatives think it’s adorable. Obama wears a tan suit, conservatives are outraged.

Leave a (Respectful) Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *