Emily Greene: Congress should pass site-neutral policies to lower patient costs and improve access
Voters may not have ranked health care as a top concern in last month’s elections, but the ever-increasing cost of care means policymakers are going to have to address the issue sooner than later.
Next year, employer health premiums are expected to jump nine percent, meaning insurance premiums could cost the average American family more than $26,000 in 2025.
Given the rising cost of living and still-too-high inflation rates, Americans can ill-afford to pay even more for health care. Sadly, that’s the reality facing millions of families nationwide. It’s a problem we hear about almost every year, and it’s happening thanks in no small part to consolidation within the health care sector.
In a growing trend that is particularly harmful for rural and underserved communities, misguided government policies are incentivizing large corporate hospitals and health systems to purchase independent physician practices and absorb their facilities into their campuses. While the acquisition of private physician practices by larger hospitals and health systems has been happening for years, the economic impact of the Covid pandemic on smaller physician practices has exacerbated this issue. As of early 2024, giant hospitals and corporate entities owned nearly 78 percent of physician practices.
Once purchased and absorbed into a hospital system, a private doctor’s office gets a brand-new classification—as a “hospital outpatient department.” Hospitals can then begin charging patients higher rates despite the care itself remaining unchanged.
According to a study by the Journal of Health Economics, prices for services provided by physician practices increase by an average of 14 percent once they have been acquired by and absorbed into a corporate hospital system—and costs can even go much higher. A routine chest x-ray, for example, cost more than three times as much in an HOPD than in a doctor’s office as of 2022.
The worst part is that, from the patient’s point of view, nothing about their local doctor’s office has changed. Sometimes, patients aren’t even aware that there has been a change in ownership. Why would they? They’re getting similar care, but hospitals can now increase their rates and slap on hidden fees that increase costs for Medicare and patients alike.
To address this issue, lawmakers must work to pass site-neutral payment reform that would prevent hospitals from taking advantage of the loophole that allows them to charge higher prices for the same care. A study by the Committee for Responsible Federal Budget found that such policies could help lower Medicare spending by more than $150 billion and reduce costs for beneficiaries by as much as $95 billion over a decade.
Currently, two pieces of legislation — the Site-based Invoicing and Transparency Enhancement (SITE) Act in the Senate and the Facilitating Accountability in Reimbursements (FAIR) Act in the House — would help achieve these goals. Both are commonsense, bipartisan bills that would ensure fairer, more transparent hospital billing practices that lower costs for consumers and taxpayers, while removing a major incentive that is driving the health care consolidation, undermining access, and driving up costs.
The next Congress should work to enact the SITE and FAIR Acts to help improve patient access and reduce spiraling health care costs. Hopefully, Pennsylvania’s delegation on Capitol Hill can help make that happen.
Emily Greene is the Pennsylvania State Director of Americans for Prosperity.
Ms. Greene,
You did a great job explaining part of an aspect to increased costs for patients. Unfortunately, your description of two pieces of legislation — (SITE) and (FAIR) – did not contain any specific details. How specifically would they ensure fairer, more transparent hospital billing practices that lower costs for consumers and taxpayers?
Healthcare is the same as anything else – supply and demand. Obamacare sought to demand a 100% rate of participation – so of course costs were going to increase! And government involvement always leads to unintended consequences and trade-offs.
QUESTION: Insurance companies collude with the providers. Different hospitals and doctors might charge different amounts for the same service, and there’s no easy way to compare this. Why do we put up with this idea that pricing should be different depending on the patient? We need to get insurance companies completely out of our healthcare.
QUESTION: Hospitals are basically restaurants without any pricing on their menus. How much of total healthcare costs are related to emergency medicine – as a percentage? 2%, 20%?
Car insurance is very different than health insurance. How?
We don’t use car insurance to pay for flat tires. Want to plug a tire? Pull up to a local service station and they might charge you $20. If insurance was involved for every basic repair a visit for a flat tire plug would cost $200 – insurance would pay $160 and you would pay $40.
Insurance ruined healthcare.
You. Are. Not. Mad. Enough.