The late comedian Redd Foxx once joked, “I call my wife Watergate — ’cause she bugs me.”
I was a young man and Nixon supporter during the Watergate scandal, and I followed the daily unfolding news closely. The unsuccessful break-in and bugging of the Democratic National Committee’s offices at the Watergate Office Building in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1972 led to President Nixon’s resignation after he had been reelected overwhelmingly against his Democratic challenger, Senator George McGovern.
I’ve been reliving those dramatic times by watching HBO’s “The White House Plumbers.”
“This five-part limited series imagines the behind-the-scenes story of how Nixon’s political saboteurs, E. Howard Hunt (Woody Harrelson) and G. Gordon Liddy (Justin Theroux), accidentally toppled the presidency they were zealously trying to protect… and their families along with it,” HBO.com states in describing “The White House Plumbers.” “Chronicling actions on the ground, this satirical drama begins in 1971 when the White House hires Hunt and Liddy, former CIA and FBI, respectively, to investigate the Pentagon Papers leak. After failing upward, the unlikely pair lands on the Committee to Re-Elect the President, plotting several unbelievable covert ops — including bugging the Democratic National Committee offices at the Watergate complex. Proving that fact is sometimes stranger than fiction, White House Plumbers sheds light on the lesser-known series of events that led to one of the greatest political scandals in American history.”
READ MORE — Paul Davis: From China, with love
Curiously, the most absurd scenes in the series are completely historically accurate. Although Liddy was a former FBI special agent and prosecutor and Hunt was a veteran intelligence officer who enlisted his former CIA Cuban-American veteran operatives, their failures are spectacularly farcical. While the scandal was unfolding, Nixon can be heard on his White House recorded tapes calling the burglary “a comedy of errors.”
I’m enjoying the series, but my one complaint is that the families of Liddy and Hunt are portrayed in the series. This is uncalled for and unfair, as the families committed no crimes, and they are not public figures.
“The White House Plumbers” is based in part on Egil “Bud” Krogh’s memoir, “Integrity: Good People, Bad Choices, and Life Lessons from the White House.” Krogh was the boss of the White House’s Special Investigations Unit, informally called the “Plumbers,” as their goal was to stop the leaks to the press.
At first, the White House described the Watergate break-in a “third-rate burglary.” But as new evidence surfaced and the Nixon White House attempted to cover up the crime, this third-rate burglary elevated to a national scandal.
Although Washington Post reporters Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward are often credited for cracking the Watergate case, it was the FBI and the federal prosecutors who investigated the case and prosecuted those involved. The Post’s reporters merely published the information provided to them by Mark Felt, a senior disgruntled FBI official who believed he had been passed over. Woodward and Bernstein called their source “Deep Throat.”
Felt gave the reporters inside information from the FBI’s investigation — an illegal act, and one that hurt the defendants’ constitutional right to a fair trial.
Woodward went on to publish best-selling nonfiction books and Bernstein went on to become a frequent commentator on CNN and other liberal networks, offering his mantra, “This is worse than Watergate” when describing various Trump actions.
(Greg Gutfeld on Fox News’ “Gutfeld!” has played a funny video montage of Bernstein repeating his mantra “Worse than Watergate” time and again).
I thought that Hunt and Liddy, two first-time offenders with fairly accomplished careers as government employees, received harsh prison sentences. Non-political people convicted of similar crimes with similar backgrounds would have been given a much less harsh sentence.
[M]y one complaint is that the families of Liddy and Hunt are portrayed in the series. This is uncalled for and unfair, as the families committed no crimes.
In the case of Hunt, he had just lost his wife in a plane crash, effectively leaving his four children parentless when he entered prison. Hunt, a prolific writer of spy and crime thrillers, wrote a memoir called, “American Spy: My Secret History in the CIA, Watergate & Beyond.”
“I’ve been called many things since the foiled break-in of the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate complex, including a criminal mastermind, a bungling burglar, and even a bad spy novelist,” Hunt wrote in the introduction. “I don’t know which accusation hurts most. Two are outrageous overstatements and one is a matter of opinion. Need I explain which is which?
“Whatever the case, none of them describe the whole man, and all disregard over two decades of service to the United States, first as a sailor in World War II, then as an OSS (Office of Strategic Services) operative, segueing into many years as a CIA agent.”
Once the Nixon White House tapes were released following a court order, Nixon was exposed as attempting to cover up the crime. Threatened to be impeached, Nixon resigned, and he was later pardoned by his successor, President Gerald Ford. The pardon prompted Ford to state, “Our long national nightmare is over.” The pardon, which was a bold and brave move for Ford to take, probably caused him to lose to Jimmy Carter.
Even worse, in my view, the exit of Nixon from the White House in effect greenlighted the North Vietnamese Army to invade South Vietnam. After the 1973 Paris agreement that ended America’s combat role in the Vietnam War, Henry Kissinger stated that Nixon told him to convey to the North Vietnamese that he would “nuke” the North Vietnamese if they invaded the South. The Communists believed him.
But after Nixon resigned, President Ford was unable to get the Democrat-led Congress to provide material support to the South Vietnamese (he did not ask for American ground troops), and the South fell to the Communists.
It bears noting the North Vietnamese did not defeat the American military. The Communists never won a battle against American troops over company strength during the entire war. When the North Vietnamese invaded the south, there were no American combat troops there, only support troops. The North Vietnamese defeated the South Vietnamese, not America.
Had Watergate not happened, and Nixon remained in office, I believe Vietnam would look much like North and South Korea. But after Nixon resigned after attempting to cover up Watergate, America lost the political will to contain the North Vietnamese.
In my view, Watergate led to the fall of South Vietnam.
Here’s another old Watergate joke I recall from MAD magazine: The burglars could not find Ellsberg’s file, as they looked under “L.”
Paul Davis, a Philadelphia writer and frequent contributor to Broad + Liberty, also contributes to Counterterrorism magazine and writes the On Crime column for the Washington Times.
In my opinion, nothing was more comedic than Nixon trying to cover up Watergate. If he would have just bit the bullet and admitted there was a collection of staff from Clown College that tried to bug the DNC headquarters for political purposes, but the effort was not sanctioned by him, he may have just escaped all the fan driven crap. As far as Vietnam, Ho Che Min was always a person driven by the desire to drive the French from Viet Nam, Cambodia and Laos (French Indochina). He led the resistace to the Japanese occupation during WWII and afterwards tried asking President Truman for assistance in keeping the French from returning to control Indochina. Some believe that the request for support was never given to Truman and Ho Che Min turned to the communists for support. Supposedly, he was not a communist and the situation established by the French surrender in 1955 took a turn for the worst when the hard-core communists seized control from him. He died shortly after, and the war began in earnest against South Viet Nam. It is possible to posit that our lack of support for Ho Che Min in the 40’s and 50’s contributed as much to defeat as did Nixion’s Watergate debacle.
It has been well-documented that Ho Chi Minh was a Communist, and quite possibly a KGB agent, in Paris prior to WWII. He did not suddenly turn into a Communist because he did not receive American aid. That is one of the many “myths” created by the Communists. “Uncle Ho” was a cold-bloodied Communist tyrant and murderer. That is why more than a million North Vietnamese escaped to South Vietnam in the 1950s.
According to Lien-Hang Nguyen’s “Hanoi’s War, ” Ho Chi Minh and General Vo Nguyen Giap were sidelined during the 1960s and the true leader of North Vietnam was Communist Party First Secretary Le Duan. Ho Chi Minh was a figurehead at that point.
Precisely. I recall that Ho Chi Minh was an ambulance driver for the French Army during WWI. Something I don’t think a diehard communist would be engaged in. In his attempt to remove the French from Indochina, he looked for any help from any quarter. I think what he truly believed in is subject to much conjecture. As far as the communist menace, interestingly, neither the Truman administration nor the Eisenhower administration did anything serious to support the French in their efforts to regain control of Indochina. Eisenhower even refused French requests to transit war supplies across the US. It seems the communist menace was only considered seriously with the Kennedy administration.
As far as bloody hands are concerned, the rulers of South Vietnam are not clean. The suppression of South Vietnamese citizens is well documented, including the iconic photograph of a Buddhist monk self-immolating. Having spent 13 months in Viet Nam in 1966-67, I got to see up close and personal, the treatment of people who just wanted to be left to make a living. I would note the discrimination toward the Montanard and the indigenous Ethnic Chinese. Granted a soldier does not see an entire war from his jungle cover, but I do think I saw enough to conclude life in South Vietnam was not all unicorns dropping rainbows and glitter.
Ho Chi Minh Not a Communist? Read this: https://www.history.com/topics/vietnam-war/ho-chi-minh-1
Yes, the hands of the rulers of South Vietnam were not clean, as you put it. But for all their faults, a million South Vietnamese did not move North to avoid them, but a million plus left the North to go South to avoid “Uncle Ho’s” Communist hellhole. And consider the million or so more “Boat People” who risked their lives in 1975 to avoid the North Vietnamese Army marching into the South.
One might say, the Vietnamese voted with their feet.
I never said Ho was not a communist, my point is that he was a communist of opportunity. I think that given the right engagement at the right moment in history by America, Viet Nam would be a far different country now, possibly without most of the intervening bloodshed. In spite of the movement south from north, the rationale for living in the South was not sufficient incentive for the South Vietnamese armed forces to resist a walk-in by the NVA, once American support ended.
“Some believe that the request for support was never given to Truman and Ho Che Min turned to the communists for support. Supposedly, he was not a communist and the situation established by the French surrender in 1955 took a turn for the worst when the hard-core communists seized control from him.”
The above is what you wrote.
Did you read the History.com piece?
Ho Chi Minh was a Moscow-trained hood, to use a term from John le Carre, and a hardened Communist operator as a young man. He was certainly not a “communist of opportunity,” as you put it. He was the leader of the hard-core Communists in Vietnam during the post-WWII era.
Your view that had America embraced the North Vietnamese Communists post-WWII, we would have avoided the Vietnam War, is a fantasy. Ho Chi Minh and the Vietnamese Communists were fanatics who would stop at nothing to take over the country, which, alas, they finally did in 1975.