In the wake of the recent supreme court decision, choice is a heated topic of conversation and debate among elected officials and the general public. Generally speaking, acknowledging that there are nuanced differences, those who are pro-life support the rights of the unborn, and those who are pro-choice support the rights of the mother. Polarizing politicians push an agenda that these concepts are mutually exclusive when in reality, very few people support a pro-life without exception or pro-choice without exception position.

Typically, Democrats are pro-choice, and Republicans are pro-life. Many Democrats vote on this issue alone in order to defend a woman’s right to choose. The mantra “My Body, My Choice” is chanted at rallies and highlighted on signs. However, when it comes to mask and vaccine mandates, many Democrats seem to have abandoned that motto. For the last two and a half years, the Wolf administration and most Democratic legislators have attempted to dictate policies governing citizen’s rights to choose. Conversely, Republicans have generally attempted to thwart mandates infringing on individual rights, but many support pro-life without exception, including when the woman’s life is in danger.

How can these extreme positions coexist? It simply makes no sense to support a woman’s right to choose abortion at any point in pregnancy up to delivery and also support forced masking and vaccination. Additionally, it is nonsensical to state that individuals should make their own decisions about vaccines and masks and also believe in the position of opposing abortion without exception. There are always exceptions that must be considered, and elected officials cannot cherry-pick which issues are worthy of choice and which are not.

READ MORE — Beth Ann Rosica: CDC’s Covid-19 guidelines for children do more harm than good

Another choice dichotomy is school choice, the concept that funding for education follows the student and not the school district. The support or lack thereof, generally breaks down along party lines. Democrats typically oppose school choice for a myriad of reasons, with the most important reason relating to the state teacher’s union (PSEA). The majority of elected Democrats, from school board director to state legislator to the executive office, are funded by the PSEA. The teacher’s unions are unequivocally against the ability to choose a school, as evidenced by their call-to-action against a proposed bill to support a voucher system for education. School choice represents a threat to the union’s existence. 

When parents are unhappy with their local public schools, if they have an opportunity to send their children to a different school at no personal cost, the state will experience a mass exodus from public school. This has already begun to happen as a result of Covid issues and subsequent parental concerns over curriculum and teacher training transparency. If enrollment continues to drop in the public school system, fewer teachers will be needed, union dues and revenue will decrease, and the PSEA will lose its hold over the state administration.

The Democrats who vehemently support, “My Body, My Choice” do not support school choice for parents to decide where their children should attend school. This same group that supports many of the equity initiatives in schools seems to not understand that many poor and/or minority families cannot afford private school. Opposition to school choice is discriminatory at its core. Every child should have access to an excellent education, not just those who can afford to pay for it. The Republicans who are anti-choice when it comes to abortion are — with a few exceptions — supportive of school choice and expansion of charter schools.

The contradictions in choice are staggering between the two parties. Democrats want choice for abortion, but not for mandates, schools, or parents. Republicans want choice for mandates, schools, and parents but not abortion. 

Regardless of your beliefs, it is impossible to ignore the inconsistencies in these platforms. Ultimately, choice is choice, and the parties cannot have it both ways. It is time to stop weaponizing the concept of choosing and recognize the contradictions in the issues. As the November midterm election approaches, it is imperative for the candidates to acknowledge and address these discrepancies and decide whether they truly stand for choice.

Beth Ann Rosica currently serves as the Executive Director of Back to School PA, a political action committee that supports school board candidates who place the interests of children first. She holds a Ph.D. in Education and has dedicated her career advocating on behalf of underserved children and families.

5 thoughts on “Beth Ann Rosica: Choice is choice”

  1. Nah, I disagree. You can have your choices… but maybe NOT in the state you live in. So, if PA decides that there is “no baby killing,” and you DON’T like that choice, then you are free to CHOOSE, to go to another state, like NY, or NJ, or DE, all very close by, to CHOOSE to get rid of your child. FREEDOM TO CHOOSE.. Just like I should have the CHOICE NOT TO SUPPORT, with my PA tax dollars, to fund abortion. If say PA keeps abortion legal, I will CHOOSE to move to another state, where my money DOES NOT support that. Again, FREEDOM TO CHOOSE. Same goes with the school choice issue. I CHOSE to PULL my child out of the Public school system and homeschool.. OUR CHOICE.. The Public schools can keep rolling on, but without my child. There is nothing wrong with extremes because there is always a middle.. People who do not support baby killing, under any circumstances, are not extreme.. they are not.. They hold themselves accountable to a higher power, and for them, no other option is okay..
    People who believe ending life is a right, believe just that.. Are they extreme? Well, its just what they believe. And the ones who want a middle ground? HAVE A CHOICE to go to another State which will provide WHAT they are looking for. Or, can decide to fight for what they want their state to be all about… we are seeing this play out in many areas already. I would argue that the debate between masks, vaccines and baby killing are not at all in the same venue. Not by a long shot.

  2. Beth Ann Rosica makes a brilliant point: Extremes are never ok. They feel good because they give us boundaries. Control. But the truth is that life is messy. Each circumstance is different, and more we cling to Right and Wrong the more we sit in our comfortable, self-righteous camps and pass judgement on others.

    1. Agree, life is messy, but doesn’t have to be. That is a choice. Whether you believe abortion is right or wrong, is not self righteous. Its just what you believe. Some people express their views “self righteously” and some people don’t. Some people are afraid to express how they feel at all, and let others talk for them. All depends how PASSIONATE you are about HOW you feel. Most of the objects created in this word, like the telephone, discovering electricity, etc.. going to the moon? WERE ALL considered EXTREME back when the conceptual ideas were presented to the public. And look where we are now with those EXTREME ideas? Just saying.

  3. Ultimately, the SCOTUS decision in this case may turn out to be the “truth in political advertising” decision. For years many Republicans have campaigned on passing state legislation to overturn or rein in Roe knowing full well that a court would use the Roe or Casey decision to render any such action as invalid. Consequently many Republicans were proud to put out a ‘pro-life’ profile. They were basically using the anti-abortion folks as pawns in the gambit for getting into or staying in office.
    Many Democrats on the other hand campaigned on the platform of being ever more pro choice because they could use the specter of the other side winning to scare donors into funneling cash into their election war chests, feeling that the abortion issue was a settled one. The SCOTUS decision now forces both sides to be more honest with their bases. Take Senator Casey for instance. When he is next up for re-election he will have to come out in favor of the ‘no restriction on abortion in Pennsylvania’ platform and campaign accordingly. Likewise for Mastriano in the current governor’s race. These characters will now have to be truly accountable to the electorate on this issue.

  4. When it comes to self-interest and politics logic seldom gets in the way. Remember politics is the adjudication of power not the arbitration of truth.

Leave a (Respectful) Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *