A school district in Erie County appears to have removed the controversial book “Gender Queer” from its high school libraries, but the real motive behind the action remains somewhat unclear.

The book, which has been the source of debate in school districts across the country, tells the story of a person who does not follow binary gender norms. However, the book also contains several graphic images of graphic sex acts. (Two images from the book can be viewed here and here.)

According to the American Library Association, it is currently the “most challenged” book in the country.

“I did a review of the book and determined that it was not suitable for our high school library. This was not because of the content of the book, but because of some of the graphic images,” wrote Fairveiw Superintendent Dr. Erik Kincade in an electronic message obtained by Broad + Liberty.

The message was sent to someone who lived in the district and who had queried Kincade about the book.

Requests for comment to the district, including questions asking for confirmation or denial of the authenticity of the message, were not returned. A search of the library’s online catalog does not show the book as being available either electronically or physically.

Despite the message sent by Kincade, the district does not appear to have otherwise commented publicly on the book’s removal.

Other districts in the commonwealth have kept the book.

For example, the West Chester Area School District voted in March to retain the book after it was first brought to the school board’s attention in late October.

A review committee found that, “There are explicit images but in context to the memoir, they are not pornographic,” and made a further comparison that many art books contain nude images.

At the March school board meeting in which WCASD decided to retain the book, board member Stacey Whomsley asked District Superintendent Dr. Robert Sokolowski if the district had an established policy for what books should be included on the library’s shelves, and which should not, usually called a “collection development policy.”

“I believe that we have received some recommendations from our librarians as to how we can — in terms of obtain our collection and consider our collection in our libraries — do that better, and using this as an opportunity as a means by which we could improve those procedures,” Sokolowski said. 

Broad + Liberty is currently in the process of obtaining collection development policies from all of the school districts in the Delaware Valley for comparison purposes.

READ MORE — Upper Darby township council fires mayor’s top administrative officer in 6-5 vote

In Central Bucks, the controversy is the collection development policy itself.

The school board there last month passed a new policy which prohibits “visual or visually implied depictions of sexual acts or simulations of such acts” or “explicit written descriptions of sexual acts.”

Critics like the American Civil Liberties Union said the language of the policy was open to broad interpretation, which, they argued, could eventually lead to other books being removed from school libraries.

In some cases, certain districts have put mechanisms in place where parents can request that certain books and materials be restricted to their children.

For example, when “Gender Queer” was disallowed in the libraries of an Illinois school district recently, a local news report noted that, “parents can refer to the student handbook on how to restrict their kids from certain materials.”

When directly asked by Broad + Liberty, WCASD did not comment on whether it had any such mechanism.

When the controversy first arose in WCASD, then-board member Chris McCune denied that “Gender Queer” was anywhere in the district’s possession.

“That book is not in our district. That book is not in a district in our county. That book is not in a district in our state. Um, so therefore it’s not really material to our board meetings,” McCune said in October.

In an email shared with Broad + Liberty, McCune later told a constituent that the materials he had been shown at the board meeting discussed “Gender Queer” as it related to a school district in Virginia, and so he misspoke because of that.

McCune later lost his bid for re-election a few days later.

Todd Shepherd is Broad + Liberty’s chief investigative reporter. Send him tips at tshepherd@broadandliberty.com, or use his encrypted email at shepherdreports@protonmail.com. @shepherdreports

5 thoughts on “Erie County school district removes “Gender Queer” book, while debate still roils in other districts”

  1. We wanted the book removed from the library because it’s disgusting. It’s not meant for children, it has an 18+ suggestion on Amazon and shows fellatio graphically.

    1. Can somebody please help me on this issue? I was aware that this was going on in the country. I googled it to look into our county and I’m trying to investigate if it’s in Erie county particularly at my son’s school and locally you know my friends I’m trying to gather to see if it’s in I live in Buffalo but my son goes to clearance middle school and I’m trying to see if these books imy child school I have heard about eight books that are circulating that are just absolutely mind-boggling how anybody would want this in the school they they detail how to do things and they’re like an experience and stuff like that. It’s it’s the book is like terrible and there’s eight of them and dumb. I think that that should be left to the parents when the child is ready to hear such thing. I believe that the curriculum goes to the teachers. I have a lot of other issues with the Carino like critical race theory, I’m afraid that’s going to come into our schools. I don’t want my son to be told that he’s white, and he never asked you a suppresses white privilege. I didn’t raise my son to look at color. I told him to bass opinions about his friends and their character so I don’t want that pushed. I don’t know if that’s gonna come here please can somebody help me an email me back if you get this comment

  2. I totally agree the book has no place in our public schools. From what I’ve seen, it is disgusting and by any means a norm in society. Ha, teach our children to count out change, and leave sex to the parents.

  3. The “new policy which prohibits “visual or visually implied depictions of sexual acts or simulations of such acts” or “explicit written descriptions of sexual acts.””

    So… how is sex ed supposed to be taught at all if literally any depiction (even written!) of the material might offend or trigger some right-winger? The new rule isn’t about this particular book at all – it’s about people with political agendas telling teachers how to do their jobs. We don’t need to make schools in to safe spaces just to satisfy a political agenda or make sure everyone is comfortable. Say whatever you will about this particular book but it is not an excuse for broad political overreach.

  4. Ladies and gentlemen, the “anti-censorship” “anti-pc” “pro-free speech” right:

    The Florida Department of Education recently rejected more than 50 MATH textbooks for use in its K-12 schools after determining that they contained ‘prohibited topics,’ such as ‘tenants of (Critical Race Theory) or other unsolicited strategies of indoctrination” despite the state providing no evidence for these claims.

    In Texas right-wing activists took over the board of a local public library, closed their meetings to the public, and started removing books from shelves that they deemed to be objectionable.

    And in Tennessee, a school board banned the teaching of Maus, a Pulitzer Prize-winning novel about the Holocaust—a move the regional chapter of the Anti-Defamation League called “shameful on every conceivable level” and that “serves no purpose other than to rob the next generation of knowledge.” 

    Florida’s Department of Education appears to have banned a math textbook for briefly highlighting the biographies of two prominent African American mathematicians. 

    One of those mathematicians was Dorothy Vaughan, herself a former math teacher, who led a computing unit for the agency we now know as NASA. Vaughan, who joined the agency at the start of World War II and who was originally forced to work in a racially segregated setting with separate bathrooms and dining areas from her White colleagues, made significant contributions to the U.S. Space Program during her 28-year career.

    That the State of Florida—home to NASA’s Kennedy Space Station—appears intent on shielding students from the contributions of Vaughan is disgraceful.

Leave a (Respectful) Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *