A new charter school report from the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools shows Pennsylvania charter schools growing more popular just as Gov. Tom Wolf (D) seeks to apply major constraints outside the purview of the General Assembly.

Charter school enrollment went up 15.5 percent from 2020 to 2021 as public school enrollment dropped by 3.2 percent, according to the report. Statewide, the number of charter school students grew to 169,252 pupils.

Wolf recently announced he is seeking to change Pennsylvania’s charter school system through regulation.

“We have a responsibility to all students, parents, and taxpayers to fix our broken charter school law,” Wolf said. “Every child in Pennsylvania deserves a high-quality education that prepares them to succeed in life, but our current law lets some charter schools perform poorly at the expense of students enrolled in traditional district schools.”

Wolf claims the regulations would save school districts some $395 million by reining in charter school costs, protect students by holding low-performing charter schools accountable, and increase transparency of for-profit companies that manage charter schools. Taxpayers spent $2.1 billion on charter schools last year. Between 2013 and 2019, 44 cents of every $1 of new property taxes went to charter schools, according to the Pennsylvania Association of School Business Officials.

But the decision to take action outside the legislative branch through regulation has encountered serious resistance.

“It’s rulemaking, which really isn’t something we have seen in Pennsylvania,” said Marc LeBlond, a senior policy analyst with the Commonwealth Foundation, which promotes free-market policies.

The governor’s office recently released a six-point plan that would change Pennsylvania charter schools through executive regulation alone. It includes changing financial and auditing standards, proscribing ethics and enrollment standards from the state, deciding how disputes are handled between charter and public schools, and state regulation of employee health care requirements.

“School choice is a popular position among parents,” said Lenny McAllister, chief executive officer of the Pennsylvania Coalition of Public Charter Schools. “Governor Wolf is on the other side of education history on this.”

‘School choice is a popular position among parents. Governor Wolf is on the other side of education history on this.’

McAllister said the governor’s recent action would be damaging to the state’s charter schools. Both McAllister and LeBlond are skeptical that Wolf is not trying to improve charter schools, but suspect he may be only taking direction from public school unions.

LeBlond said Wolf accepted over $1 million in campaign contributions from those unions’ political action committees.

“He’s couching this as saving money for the school districts,” McAllister said. “The school districts feel it’s their money. It’s not their money. It’s the family’s money. Parents should decide.”

The CEO thinks there will be charter school closings if the governor’s plan was enacted. He acknowledged the troubles of the Pennsylvania charter school system, but believes executive regulation is an overreach by the governor, ignoring the voices of hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvania charter school parents and students.

Meanwhile, Wolf’s spokeswoman released this statement: “Bipartisan legislators and the governor are supporting a common sense and fair plan to address the state’s broken charter school law which is causing the cost of charter and cyber charter schools to rise out of control and increasing the burden on local property taxpayers.

The plan makes two changes to align charter school funding closer to traditional public school funding so students are treated more fairly regardless of which public school they chose. The plan funds special education in charter schools the same way the state already does for traditional public schools.  Some charters are vastly overpaid for services they do not provide, leaving special education students in school districts and other charter schools with less funding. Addressing the overpayments saves $99 million.

READ MORE — Jennifer Lindner: Moms and children should take an educational stand in the name of liberty.

The other change creates a single cyber school tuition rate of no more than $9,500 per regular education student, reflecting the actual cost of an online education by higher-performing cyber schools. Currently, cyber schools charge school districts between $9,170 and $22,300 per student, while Intermediate Units only charge $5,400 per online student. A fair statewide rate ensures taxpayers are not overcharged, saving $130 million a year. Since many charter schools are also managed by for-profit companies, the plan also addresses needed transparency and accountability measures.”

Public input on the regulation by Pennsylvania citizens is limited to a 30-day comment period that ends October 18. Pennsylvanians can provide comments by emailing RA-EDCharterRegs@pa.gov .Wolf expects the regulations to be in place by 2023.

Both McAlister and LeBlond believe the best way the state’s charter schools should be reformed is through legislative action.

“The majority of parents want expanded choice,” McAllister said. “We’re looking for bipartisan (engagement.).”

“I think as we approach the upcoming period of legislation and students have entered a new school year I’d like Gov. Wolf to ask what’s going to help these kids?” LeBlond said. “They’ve really been through a difficult time. All this political gamesmanship has to stop.”

Matthew Liptak is a news, feature, and content writer and editor from Maryland.

This article was republished with permission from the Delaware Valley Journal.

Leave a (Respectful) Comment

Your email address will not be published.