Gina Diorio: For real lobbying reform, Harrisburg must look in the mirror
We’ve heard the Scriptural principle, “Before you take the speck out of your brother’s eye, take the beam out of your own.”
This warning against trying to fix a problem in others without addressing a larger problem in ourselves is particularly fitting when it comes to the well-meaning effort by the state Legislature to institute greater transparency among lobbyists, among other things.
While this effort targets some small areas ripe for change, it could correct a larger problem if only Harrisburg would look in the mirror. That problem is government directing our tax dollars to groups or individuals who then lobby government for higher taxes to fund the very bureaucracies they represent.
In other words, Pennsylvanians are paying to try to raise taxes on themselves and they don’t even know it. Ridiculous, but true.
While Pennsylvanians rightly bemoan our 16th-highest-in-the-nation state and local tax burden, taxpayer-funded governments and associations spend millions to hire lobbyists to persuade lawmakers to hike spending and taxes. Unfortunately, this taxpayer-funded lobbying is legal.
Taxpayer-funded governments and associations spend millions to hire lobbyists to persuade lawmakers to hike spending and taxes.
According to research shared with me by the Commonwealth Foundation, from 2017-2020, local governments across Pennsylvania—including counties, municipalities, and school districts—gave $24.1 million in taxpayer dollars to membership associations that actively lobby. What’s more, since 2007, local governments and agencies have handed over $18 million to hire lobbyists, for a combined total of more than $42 million.
As one example, Pennsylvania counties gave more than $11 million in membership dues and fees to the County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania (CCAP) and its affiliates. CCAP then lobbied state lawmakers for things like increased county funding (which, of course, comes from your tax dollars) and other projects and legislation.
School districts, which perpetually claim underfunding, have also mastered the art of taxpayer-funded lobbying. Information from about 20 percent of Pennsylvania’s 500 school districts shows they gave more than $10 million to associations including the Pennsylvania State Education Association (PSEA), the Pennsylvania School Boards Association (PSBA), and the Pennsylvania Association of School Business Officials (PASBO).
These associations collectively spend millions on political activity and lobbying. Among their priorities are higher education funding (i.e. more of our tax dollars), increased funding for pensions (also our tax dollars), and stronger restrictions on school choice (so they can retain—you guessed it—our tax dollars).
Earlier this month, the above-named groups joined several others in lobbying the state Senate against a bill that would expand educational opportunity for students with special needs.
Beyond paying associations, local governments, agencies, and school districts directly hire contract lobbyists. For example, from 2009 to 2016, Beaver County in western Pa. paid a firm $250,000 to lobby Harrisburg for more federal stimulus money. As a result, the county secured $300,000 in state funding. Clearly, the lobbying firm got the most stimulation!
Here in the southeast, Delaware County paid a lobbying firm $940,000 from 2013-20. The city of Philadelphia spent $2 million on five lobbying firms between 2008-20, and the Philadelphia School District paid more than $700,000 to three different lobbying firms from 2013-20. These firms got paid with tax dollars to lobby for … more tax dollars.
There’s no good reason for the government to use our tax dollars to hire a lobbyist to lobby the government for more tax dollars.
The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), funded largely through our tax dollars, along with millions of dollars from the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, is slated to spend nearly $4 million on lobbying firms between 2015 and 2022. These firms petition Harrisburg for more funding from—you guessed it—our tax dollars.
Here’s the kicker. Local governments and agencies are allowed to engage in lobbying as part of their operations. But instead, they spend more of our money to hire outside lobbyists to push for things that may be directly contrary to taxpayers’ interests.
And because we have information from only a small percentage of government entities and agencies, we know the actual amount of our tax dollars spent on lobbying is much, much higher than the $42 million mentioned above.
There’s no good reason for the government to use our tax dollars to hire a lobbyist to lobby the government for more tax dollars.
If we truly want to reform our lobbying system, this is the place to start.
Let’s remove that beam first, and then address the many specks in need of reform.
Gina Diorio is the Public Affairs Director at Commonwealth Partners Chamber of Entrepreneurs, an independent, non-partisan, 501(c)(6) membership organization dedicated to improving the economic environment and educational opportunities in Pennsylvania. www.thecommonwealthpartners.com.
Why is the PA GOP refusing to even debate lifting the gift exemption for political donations? Who do they serve anyway? Elite donors or the people of PA?
Guess they value their “gifts” over what’s good for hard working Americans. Sad.
Is there a reason you don’t mention the fact that Democrat Gov. Wolf signed a bill to ban gifts being made to the executive branch but Republican Senate Leader Corman won’t do the same for the legislature?