In 1981, Philadelphia Police Officer Danny Faulkner was murdered by Mumia Abu Jamal. A racially diverse jury convicted Jamal of first degree murder and sentenced him to death. Since then, he has pursued endless appeals in state and federal courts. Although his death sentence was overturned on a technicality, his conviction has been repeatedly affirmed.

Throughout this lengthy process, the Commonwealth has been zealously represented by three previous district attorneys. Now the defense of Jamal’s conviction is in the hands of District Attorney Larry Krasner, the self-styled “public defender with power,” who during his short time in office has established an appalling record of undercharging violent criminals and astonishing indifference to the interests of crime victims.

Maureen Faulkner petitioned the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to disqualify Krasner’s office from any further involvement in the Jamal case based on conflicts of interest.

Now, after 37 years of appeals, Jamal has filed a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence of alleged misconduct by the trial prosecutor. But Krasner’s office has never consulted the accused trial prosecutor concerning the allegations of misconduct. And, instead of contesting those accusations, Krasner’s office text message Maureen Faulkner, the murdered police officer’s long-suffering widow, that it was consenting to allow a hearing to proceed on these allegations. The failure to even consult the trial prosecutor and the unwarranted consent to a hearing on these allegations raise serious questions regarding Krasner’s intentions and his willingness to zealously oppose this latest move by Jamal to gain his freedom.

Accordingly, last week attorneys representing Maureen Faulkner petitioned the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to disqualify Krasner’s office from any further involvement in the Jamal case based on conflicts of interest. The petition is supported by damning exhibits that demonstrate why Krasner should be removed from the case. Among these exhibits is a detailed affidavit by the accused prosecutor refuting each and every claim of misconduct and stating under oath that he has never been contacted by Krasner’s office about these claims.

Read more here.

Leave a (Respectful) Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *